SBF’s Supreme Court appeal challenges conviction evidence and $11B forfeiture

SBF’s Supreme Court appeal challenges his conviction evidence and $11 billion forfeiture. Sam Bankman-Fried’s (SBF) lawyer in his appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Jeffrey Fisher, told Cointelegraph that Sam’s petition to the Supreme Court raises two key arguments. First, Bankman-Fried’s criminal trial used irrelevant losses incurred by the customers of FTX to determine whether he should be charged with crimes. Second, his $11 billion forfeiture violates the Eighth Amendment. First, the justices have to decide whether or not to accept the case.

BeCrypto News shows a short excerpt and links to the publisher. The full report belongs to Cryptopolitan.