UNC Law's AI justices match a Supreme Court ruling, not its feel

Three ChatGPT-based AI justices reached the same result as the US Supreme Court during an October 22 mock argument at the University of North Carolina School of Law. The outcome matched; the give-and-take did not, Reuters reported October 28. A 2-1 vote that mirrored a 5-4 decision At “May It Please the Machine,” third-year students Elijah Baetz and Reda Ansar argued Monsalvo Velázquez v. Bondi , a 2025 immigration case, UNC Law said. The issue: if a 60-day voluntary-departure deadline fell on Saturday, did it extend to Monday? That deadline marks when someone allowed to leave the US on their own must depart to avoid penalties. Data librarian Rolando Rodriguez developed three AI justices using a single ChatGPT model. Each judge followed a different approach to interpreting the law.

BeCrypto News shows a short excerpt and links to the publisher. The full report belongs to Cryptopolitan.